Teams

Tiffany Blackwell

2022 Adult 18-39 · 4.0 & 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesTheresa Nelson / Emily Fike vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Blackwell / Theresa Nelson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-27vs Colti CallagyLost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Blackwell / Theresa Nelson vs Wesley Bush / Ingrid Brown2-6, 4-6
2022-03-06vs Colti CallagyWon 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Nelson / Emily Fike vs Wesley Bush / Elizabeth Roberts6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-27vs Colti CallagyLost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Blackwell / Theresa Nelson vs Kayla Ruelle / Ingrid Brown3-6, 1-6
2022-02-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Roberts / Theresa Nelson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-06vs Colti CallagyLost 01
L#3 DoublesTiffany Blackwell / Theresa Nelson vs Elizabeth Roberts / Mallory Plungkhen4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 & 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Colti Callagy9022512162
2Tiffany Blackwell0952245276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Erin Hambrick
published 4.5
4.28
Theresa Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
4.12
Sara Maguire
published
4.00
Erica Ketchem
published 4.5
3.97
Alyson Bollinger
published 4
3.83
Tiffany Blackwell
published
Amy Strasburg
published 4
3.63
Emily Fike
published 4
3.60
Jessi Reed
published
3.37
Emilia DiVita
published 4
Kara Hoegerl
published
Ting Fan Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Maguire + Jessi Reed602559% games+6.7% vs expected
Theresa Nelson + Tiffany Blackwell10458% games+4.4% vs expected
Theresa Nelson + Emily Fike3452% games−5.8% vs expected
Tiffany Blackwell + Emily Fike044 matchesnot enough data
Alyson Bollinger + Tiffany Blackwell213 matchesnot enough data
Jessi Reed + Erin Hambrick213 matchesnot enough data
Emilia DiVita + Amy Strasburg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Hambrick
131W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
4.36
Theresa Nelson
62W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
Sara Maguire
124W–56L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Erica Ketchem
32W–34L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Alyson Bollinger
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
Tiffany Blackwell
66W–69L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Amy Strasburg
53W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Emily Fike
12W–28L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Jessi Reed
99W–59L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.60
4
Emilia DiVita
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.37
Kara Hoegerl
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ting Fan Chang
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.