Teams

MO/Wassam-3.0-4.0WTri-Level

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over 3.0-4.0 Tri-Level · 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-04vs April Edwards 3.0-4.0 WomenWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Turk / Deb Jochems vs Katie Wilkinson / Lynelle Phillips7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cleveland / Lois Dresslaer vs Laurie Everett / Jill Wade6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Kortney Wassam vs Cheryl Ballou / Rachael Drum6-4, 6-1
2025-10-04vs April Edwards 3.0-4.0 WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeb Jochems / Lori Hunt vs Linda Putman / Lynelle Phillips6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Pell / Stephanie Wachob vs Kathy Hodges / Beverly Horvit6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristina Britt / Kortney Wassam vs Pam McAllister / April Edwards6-7, 1-6
2025-10-04vs April Edwards 3.0-4.0 WomenWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Turk / Yuliya Zubina vs Linda Putman / Katie Wilkinson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLois Dresslaer / Margaret Cleveland vs Kathy Hodges / Jill Wade6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Britt / Hee-Sun Kim vs Rachael Drum / Cheryl Ballou6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Hee-Sun Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Margaret Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Christina Britt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Kortney Wassam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Stephanie Wachob
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Debbie Pell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Lois Dresslaer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Deb Jochems
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lori Hunt
published
Stephanie Turk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yuliya Zubina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Turk + Deb Jochems6165% gamesnot enough data
Kortney Wassam + Deb Jochems1442% gamesnot enough data
Hee-Sun Kim + Debbie Pell303 matchesnot enough data
Christina Britt + Kortney Wassam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hee-Sun Kim
85W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Margaret Cleveland
35W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Christina Britt
28W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
Kortney Wassam
43W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Stephanie Wachob
55W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Debbie Pell
112W–89L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Lois Dresslaer
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Deb Jochems
50W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lori Hunt
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Turk
34W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuliya Zubina
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.