Teams

Jones/18+/3.5/TRI/GGRC

2026 Lake Charles Tri Level 18 & Over - Women · 3.5,3.0,2.5 LC (18&O) Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-16vs Jackson/18/3.5/TRI/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPenny Misse / Penny Duffy vs Audra Jackson / Erika Carlisle1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarcela Jones / Amelia Crawford vs Holli Abate / Christin Broussard0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLillian Lundy / Kayla Hebert vs Amelie Bennett / Jennifer Sproles2-6, 1-6
2026-08-09vs Callaba/18/3.5/TRI/GWLost 12
L#1 DoublesPenny Misse / Penny Duffy vs Elisha Privat / Marcie Bradley4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShelly Brescher / Katelyn Matthews vs Maria Faul / CHRISTY VALENTINE6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDawn Redd / Kayla Hebert vs Laurie Callaba / Mila Robichaux0-6, 1-6
2026-08-02vs Jackson/18/3.5/TRI/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Kuhne / Jennifer Black vs Patti Ward / Sydney Augustine0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Brescher / Katelyn Matthews vs Christin Broussard / Holli Abate5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLillian Lundy / Kayla Hebert vs Samantha Orduno / Jennifer Sproles3-6, 6-7
2026-07-26vs Callaba/18/3.5/TRI/GWLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Black / Anne Kuhne vs Kendrea Terrell / Marcie Bradley2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmelia Crawford / Suzie Kingsley vs Laurie Callaba / Maria Faul3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKayla Hebert / Dawn Redd vs Emmie Gonsoulin / Catherine Osbourn1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5,3.0,2.5 LC (18&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jackson/18/3.5/TRI/LCRC3193670
2Callaba/18/3.5/TRI/GW3184878
3Jones/18+/3.5/TRI/GGRC0411122138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Penny Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Anne Kuhne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Penny Misse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Shelly Brescher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Katelyn Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Suzie Kingsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Amelia Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.25
Dawn Redd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Marcela Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Lillian Lundy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Duffy
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Anne Kuhne
21W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Penny Misse
59W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Shelly Brescher
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
Katelyn Matthews
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Suzie Kingsley
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Amelia Crawford
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.36
2.5
Dawn Redd
15W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Marcela Jones
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Lillian Lundy
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.