Teams

SSD BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs SSHP BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesScott Alvarez / Daniel McGowan vs Jon Leonard / Nick Poulos2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Cadkin vs Jason Wagner1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBradley Scott / Mark Custer vs Ward Cerny / Mark Hynes3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Henning / Ray Rosado vs Craig Evans / Garry Byers6-7, 6-7
2021-07-13vs KC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesPhil Braaten / Jeremy Roberts vs Dennis Greco / Alan Larson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBradley Scott vs Kevin McCarthy2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Miller / Mark Custer vs Scott DEEM / J Douglas Wilson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKen Peterlin / Ray Rosado vs Thomas Moore / Larry Hay1-6, 2-6
2021-07-06vs SKY GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesPhil Braaten / Jeremy Roberts vs Chris Smith / Elmo Morales0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Cadkin vs Tim Hutchens3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Miserlian / Daniel McGowan vs David Mathias / Vince Larson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRay Rosado / Ken Peterlin vs Merle Atkinson / Douglas Poirier0-6, 0-6
2021-06-29vs EM GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesScott Alvarez / Ray Rosado vs Stephen LoJacono / David Dornbirer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBradley Scott vs Jason Zink6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhil Braaten / Jeremy Roberts vs TIMOTHY DENEZZA / Darren Malia1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Henning / Brian Miserlian vs J Scott Landers / Jeff Sigman1-6, 2-6
2021-06-22vs LTFC NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesScott Alvarez / Brett Henning vs Jonathan Moore / Jay Rael6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJohn Cadkin vs AJ Howard1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Scott / Ken Peterlin vs Michael Smith / John Randazzo1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPhil Braaten / Mark Custer vs David Lash / Mitchell Kaplan1-6, 1-6
2021-06-15vs WC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesPhil Braaten / Bradley Scott vs Steve Pulver / Brad Lewis5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesScott Alvarez vs Eyal Tzarfati6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKevin Miller / Ken Peterlin vs David Friedman / Michael Gagne0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRay Rosado / Brian Miserlian vs Jeff Milanovich / Dave Anderson0-6, 0-6
2021-06-08vs EM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesScott Alvarez / Mark Custer vs Tyler Lindvall / Troy Fornstrom2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBradley Scott vs Matt McCune1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Miller / Jeremy Roberts vs Tom Giesen / Stephen Rohs4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel McGowan / Brett Henning vs Ethan Lew / Andy Engeman3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
John Cadkin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Scott Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.60
Phil Braaten
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.51
Mark Custer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
Bradley Scott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Daniel McGowan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Brett Henning
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Brian Miserlian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jeremy Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ken Peterlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ray Rosado
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Scott + Mark Custer0522% games−12.4% vs expected
Ray Rosado + Daniel McGowan0520% games−15.9% vs expected
Brian Miserlian + Daniel McGowan0619% games−16.8% vs expected
Phil Braaten + Jeremy Roberts033 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Roberts + Ray Rosado033 matchesnot enough data
Ken Peterlin + Mark Custer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Cadkin
45W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Scott Alvarez
66W–96L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.86
2.5
Phil Braaten
26W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%22%78%
2.60
2.5
Mark Custer
28W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%47%53%
2.51
2.5
Bradley Scott
21W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Daniel McGowan
4W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Brett Henning
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Brian Miserlian
0W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeremy Roberts
3W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ken Peterlin
0W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ray Rosado
0W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.