Teams

Suntree - McIntosh

2023 Brevard Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-18vs Rockledge - FaillaWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Hastings / Cory Darrow vs Melinda Hartnett / Jim Tulloch7-6, 6-2
2023-07-11vs Viera Regional Park - HeltonWon 10
W#2 DoublesAbigail Smith / Matthew Pierce vs Donna Paternoster / Michael Bealer6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-27vs Fee - RouveyrolWon 20
W#1 DoublesCory Darrow / Abigail Smith vs Christopher Meenen / Caroline Jiborn6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Charitat / David Charitat vs Ally Heeley / Stephan Rouveyrol6-3, 6-2
2023-06-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Hastings / Robert Thompson vs Jeffrey Hill / Jeannie Fox Craig6-4, 6-3
2023-06-13vs Sarno - DwyerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Pierce / Nancy Hastings vs Carl Acquaviva / Courtney Thomassen4-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Brevard/Simmons/Mixed18&Over7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKyle McIntosh / Nancy Charitat vs Cynthia Simmons / Gregory Whitaker3-6, 4-6
2023-05-23vs Kiwi - JacksonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatthew Pierce / Abigail Smith vs Jennifer Jackson / Sean Kelly3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Charitat / Kyle McIntosh vs Tracey Draper / Erik Moore6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobert Thompson / Ann Passmore vs Valerie Baldwin / Robert Baldwin6-3, 6-0
2023-05-16vs Kiwanis - HopkinsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKyle McIntosh / Ann Passmore vs Shelly Rosseau / Jamell Caswell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Kyle McIntosh
published
3.45
Lee Harrington
published
3.35
Sandra Rowe
published
3.33
Ann Passmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Nancy Charitat
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Sharon Bean
published
3.13
Stephanie McIntosh
published
2.87
Nancy Hastings
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
David Charitat
published 3
Abigail Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle McIntosh
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Lee Harrington
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sandra Rowe
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Ann Passmore
135W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Nancy Charitat
101W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Sharon Bean
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Stephanie McIntosh
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Nancy Hastings
108W–120L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
David Charitat
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Abigail Smith
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.