Teams

MG-Phillips

2023 Spring USTA 40 & Over Day League-Montgomery · 4.0 Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Erin Bradshaw
published 4.5
3.88
Michelle Slack
published
3.85
Sandra Putz
published
3.82
Leslie Davis
published
Debbie Todd
published 4
3.66
Kelly Bibb
published
3.47
Julie Brand
published
3.33
Katharine Harris
published
3.25
Michelle Jacobs
published
3.10
Kim Littlefield
published
Jennifer Black
published
Jessica Carson
published
Julie Naftel
published
Karen Phillips
published
Stuart Yelverton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Slack + Jennifer Black404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Bradshaw
19W–3L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Michelle Slack
36W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
Sandra Putz
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Leslie Davis
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Debbie Todd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Bibb
20W–18L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
Julie Brand
23W–43L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
Katharine Harris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.33
Michelle Jacobs
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.25
Kim Littlefield
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Black
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Carson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Naftel
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Phillips
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stuart Yelverton
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.