Teams

Wedgewood

2023 SUMMER Combo Women · Summer 6.5W Combo

20 players · average NTRP 3.21 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-19vs Muirfield VillageWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Skop / Abigail Shoemaker vs Pat Halsey / Judith Galeano6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim Schmid / Erin Wilcox vs Erin Daly / Stephanie Stoflinsky2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Roy / Julie Jones vs Jill Cullinan / Mary Ehrsam6-2, 6-2
2023-06-28vs RC NiniLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Bull / Heidi Baughman vs MacKenzie Skellan / Katherine Cain6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Roy / Jody Penrod vs Ashley Wilkins / Michelle Koffel2-6, 1-6
2023-06-21vs RC DixonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Jones / Karen Muraski vs Shirin Amini / Michelle Roettger6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAli Spencer / Wendy Bull vs Yoshie Narui / Leigh Temsey1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAbigail Shoemaker / Wendy Haddow vs Carole Wissman / Angela Lanctot6-1, 6-1
2023-06-14vs GroveportLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Nunley / Karen Muraski vs Joy McArthur / Amy Bratton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Haddow / Connie Schmidt vs Tiffany Culver / Jennifer Latimer0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJody Penrod / Ali Spencer vs Sophie Culver / Heather Brown-Borden1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 6.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Ashley Skop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Abby McGill
published 3.5
3.48
Kavita Sharma
published
3.37
Abigail Shoemaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Andrea McClymont
published 3.5
Amy Turturice
published 3.5
3.06
Leah Mccoy
published
3.04
Wendy Bull
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Kim Schmid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Heidi Baughman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Carol Roy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Wendy Haddow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ali Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Christine Cho
published 3
2.61
Connie Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Deborah Nunley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.18
Jody Penrod
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.74
Erin Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karen Muraski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Boyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Nunley + Lauren Boyer5260% games+20.5% vs expected
Wendy Bull + Carol Roy3447% games+13.7% vs expected
Connie Schmidt + Lauren Boyer4355% games+7.7% vs expected
Ali Spencer + Lauren Boyer7648% games+7.1% vs expected
Abigail Shoemaker + Ashley Skop6162% games+4.5% vs expected
Wendy Haddow + Carol Roy3446% games+2.8% vs expected
Erin Wilcox + Deborah Nunley2343% games+1.3% vs expected
Deborah Nunley + Ali Spencer4546% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Skop
66W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Abby McGill
73W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kavita Sharma
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Abigail Shoemaker
30W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Andrea McClymont
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Amy Turturice
34W–63L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leah Mccoy
69W–68L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Wendy Bull
41W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kim Schmid
24W–64L career · 1 line in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Heidi Baughman
39W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Carol Roy
43W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
Wendy Haddow
67W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ali Spencer
27W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Christine Cho
18W–38L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Connie Schmidt
44W–89L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Deborah Nunley
46W–104L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.42
Jody Penrod
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.18
2.5
Erin Wilcox
16W–97L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Karen Muraski
24W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Boyer
26W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.