Teams

SGV Double Trouble-Navarro-ATCC/SU3

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.94 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesYvette Kopoushian / Jackie Yi vs Karen Dacayo / Kam Jara3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-05vs SGV Dare Doubles-Chang-WN/SALost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria McGregor / Jackie Yi vs Oraer Pluta / Christine Pedroza6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Yi / Julie Sheehy vs Jean Shin / Quyen Metzger6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesCarly Crouch / Jackie Yi vs May Low / Andrea Fruits3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Claire Jarashow
published 3
2.85
Jackie Yi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Elizabeth Woo
published 3
2.76
Noel Minor
published
Cindy McCarthy
published 3
Hilary Scofield
published 3
2.75
Cynthia Jordan
published 3
2.69
Julie Thomson
published
2.57
Jaime Stoney
published 3
2.50
Christy Jenstad
published
2.45
Tiffany Ewing
published
2.44
Yvette Kopoushian
published
2.42
TONI GITTER
published
2.26
Carly Crouch
published 2.5
Julie Sheehy
published
Tracey Spiegel
published
Victoria McGregor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TONI GITTER + Cynthia Jordan134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Woo + Cynthia Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claire Jarashow
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Jackie Yi
39W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Elizabeth Woo
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
Noel Minor
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Cindy McCarthy
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Hilary Scofield
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Cynthia Jordan
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
Julie Thomson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Jaime Stoney
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
Christy Jenstad
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
Tiffany Ewing
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Yvette Kopoushian
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.44
TONI GITTER
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Carly Crouch
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.26
Julie Sheehy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracey Spiegel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria McGregor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.