Teams

NewEngland/Shea/55&O/8.0X

2025 EMA Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-18vs WIG:Wightman:MedeirosWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Elmer / Maura O'Brien vs Lisa Kenney / Michael Gagliardi0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Shea / James O'Brien vs John Kenney / Elena Shashkova6-2, 6-1
2025-09-05vs WIG:Wightman:MedeirosWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Elmer / Mei Swank vs Chetana Keltcher / Robert Murray3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Shea / James O'Brien vs Gregg Barnes / Hayley Barnes6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesScott Tedford / Maura O'Brien vs Lisa Kenney / John Kenney6-1, 6-0
2025-08-21vs WIG:Wightman:MedeirosWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Connor / Sally Woolston vs James Medeiros / Elena Shashkova6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Callahan / Patricia Ehlbeck vs Robert Murray / Chetana Keltcher4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMei Swank / Scott Tedford vs Doris O'Sullivan / John Kenney6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-15vs WIG:Wightman:MedeirosWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Casaletto / Kevin Connor vs Robert Murray / Chetana Keltcher6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCraig Stearns / Tracy Surette vs Eric Yi / Janet Yi4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRandal Noller / Sally Woolston vs James Medeiros / Elena Shashkova6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-08vs WIG:Wightman:MedeirosWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeonard Licari / Sally Woolston vs Eric Yi / Janet Yi6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Callahan / Catharine Hayes vs Michael Gagliardi / Lisa Kenney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Surette / Craig Stearns vs Ari Milstein / Robin Milstein7-6, 3-5, 0-1
2025-08-01vs WIG:Wightman:MedeirosWon 21
L#1 DoublesSally Woolston / Leonard Licari vs Eric Yi / Janet Yi6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRandal Noller / Catharine Hayes vs James Medeiros / Alison Harbilas7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Ehlbeck / Craig Stearns vs Ari Milstein / Robin Milstein5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Michael Elmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Patricia Ehlbeck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Catharine Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Kathryn Casaletto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Callahan
published 4
3.75
Tracy Surette
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Craig Stearns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Randal Noller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Maura O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Leonard Licari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Donna Shea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
James O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mei Swank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sally Woolston
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Scott Tedford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leonard Licari + Sally Woolston5250% games−6.5% vs expected
Kathryn Casaletto + Kevin Connor12361% gamesnot enough data
Leonard Licari + Tracy Surette2845% gamesnot enough data
David Callahan + Patricia Ehlbeck4350% gamesnot enough data
Catharine Hayes + Kevin Connor4161% gamesnot enough data
Donna Shea + Michael Elmer224 matchesnot enough data
Mei Swank + Michael Elmer134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Ehlbeck + Leonard Licari033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Elmer
44W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
Patricia Ehlbeck
81W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Catharine Hayes
75W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Kathryn Casaletto
87W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
4
David Callahan
60W–54L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Surette
91W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Craig Stearns
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Randal Noller
114W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Maura O'Brien
26W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Leonard Licari
87W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Donna Shea
57W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
James O'Brien
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kevin Connor
55W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mei Swank
63W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Woolston
102W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Tedford
80W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.