Teams

BURK-Matthews

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs MTC-ScammellWon 10
W#3 DoublesModestine Carter / Chad Eldridge vs Tracy Marks / Peggy McElgunn6-4, 6-2
2022-03-13vs RAIN-RaghavanWon 10
W#3 DoublesModestine Carter / Joshua Durbin vs Mallika Chary / Madhav Kidambi7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-06vs WW-PrinceLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeith Harvey / Modestine Carter vs Todd Prince / Leslie Altaffer5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEthan Belote / Kathy Denunzio vs Craig Heah / Becca Meekins7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-26vs CSW-GeorgeWon 10
W#2 DoublesEthan Belote / Kathy Denunzio vs David Israel / Caroline Ogilvie7-6, 6-3
2022-02-19vs RAIN-EarleWon 10
W#2 DoublesEthan Belote / Modestine Carter vs Gary Wills / Julie Stivers7-5, 6-3
2022-02-06vs SAL-MaliffLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathy Denunzio / Michael Hazelwood vs Anne Maliff / Chris Martin2-6, 2-6
2022-01-29vs MAC-WhiteSplit 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Hughes / Modestine Carter vs Darren Jones / Leigh Ann Barker5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Denunzio / Craig Matthews vs Bernice White / Zach Pettit6-3, 7-5
2022-01-08vs WW-ColemanLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoshua Durbin / Modestine Carter vs Anna Shea / Brandon Covey2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Blake Goldsmith
published 5
4.45
Ethan Belote
published 4.5
4.08
Joshua Durbin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.96
Keith Harvey
published
3.79
Thomas Hughes
published
3.75
Kathy Denunzio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.50
Modestine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.28
Marie Browning
published
Chad Eldridge
published 3.5
Melissa Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Durbin + Modestine Carter6650% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Durbin + Kathy Denunzio4148% gamesnot enough data
Michael Hazelwood + Blake Goldsmith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Blake Goldsmith
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.81
4.5
Ethan Belote
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.45
4
Joshua Durbin
73W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
4.08
Keith Harvey
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.96
Thomas Hughes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Kathy Denunzio
125W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Modestine Carter
219W–132L career · 11 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Marie Browning
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Chad Eldridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Stewart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.