Teams

Team Trang/Kuszelewicz

2023 55&Over Mixed · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-29vs NJ: Team Van MolLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelinda Trang / Ritch Belen vs Joan Kern / Bobby Choe2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Engel / Adelo Mascarinas vs Michelle Chung / Sadik Sendich6-7, 0-5
2023-04-22vs NJ: Team Van MolLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Fiumefreddo / Todd Sherman vs JANET van MOL / Yannis Androulakis7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Engel / Kim Phimsipasom vs Marie Collazo / Peter Tilles4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilly Kuszelewicz / Mark Pollack vs Molly Mahn / Rudolf van Mol0-6, 2-6
2023-04-16vs NJ: Team Van MolLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Plotnick / Linda Fiumefreddo vs Bobby Choe / Eva Danieli3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRitch Belen / Willy Kuszelewicz vs Harry Douglas / Marie Collazo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Pollack / Susanna Smit vs George Sheffey / Joan Kern6-1, 6-3
2023-04-02vs NJ: Team Van MolWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Engel / Kim Phimsipasom vs Janet Bellaran / Ramaswami Venkatesh6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilly Kuszelewicz / Ritch Belen vs Yannis Androulakis / Michelle Chung7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Pollack / Susanna Smit vs Sarah Karchere / Patrick McGovern7-5, 4-3
2023-03-25vs NJ: Team Van MolLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Engel / Daniel Plotnick vs Peter Tilles / Deborah Berger7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Fiumefreddo / Todd Sherman vs Liz Christian / Bobby Choe4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSerena-G Xu / Adelo Mascarinas vs Eva Danieli / George Sheffey4-6, 3-6
2023-03-18vs NJ: Team Van MolWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelinda Trang / Daniel Plotnick vs Deborah Berger / Rudolf van Mol3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Fiumefreddo / Todd Sherman vs Rosemarie Kulp / Harold Stern3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Pollack / Susanna Smit vs Janet Bellaran / Ramaswami Venkatesh6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-12vs NJ: Team Van MolLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Plotnick / Lisa Engel vs George Sheffey / Rosemarie Kulp3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusanna Smit / Mark Pollack vs Patrick McGovern / Sarah Karchere6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAdelo Mascarinas / Melinda Trang vs Harry Douglas / JANET van MOL7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-03-04vs NJ: Team Van MolLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Sherman / Linda Fiumefreddo vs Bobby Choe / Liz Christian3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRitch Belen / Melinda Trang vs Sadik Sendich / JANET van MOL5-7, 2-4
L#3 DoublesSusanna Smit / Kim Phimsipasom vs Ramaswami Venkatesh / Joan Kern7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Team Van Mol6217719194
2Team Trang/Kuszelewicz2671737253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Todd Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Daniel Plotnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Susanna Smit
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Melinda Trang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Ritch Belen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Willy Kuszelewicz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Lisa Engel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Adelo Mascarinas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Linda Fiumefreddo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kim Phimsipasom
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Serena-G Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Trang + Ritch Belen3454% gamesnot enough data
Mark Pollack + Susanna Smit4254% gamesnot enough data
Todd Sherman + Linda Fiumefreddo224 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Trang + Adelo Mascarinas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Sherman
53W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Daniel Plotnick
63W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Susanna Smit
42W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Melinda Trang
135W–132L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Ritch Belen
123W–137L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Willy Kuszelewicz
43W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Lisa Engel
56W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Adelo Mascarinas
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Fiumefreddo
47W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kim Phimsipasom
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Pollack
63W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Serena-G Xu
81W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.