Teams

Labbe/18/3.5/WD/BREC

2024 BR Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.29 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Pixley
published 3.5
3.21
Sheila Gordon
published
3.16
Brenda Katzmarzyk
published 3.5
3.15
Corinne Viso
published 3.5
3.11
Suzanne Wortmann
published
3.10
Darilyn Baudoin
published 3.5
2.98
Kyle Barker
published
2.87
Amy Slate
published 3
2.86
Donna Mitchell
published 3
2.85
Carole Wilkins
published 3
2.81
Melanie McCall
published
2.77
Shelly Labbe
published
2.68
Kelly Bauder
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Pam Farmer
published
Sandra Rubenstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Katzmarzyk + Sheila Gordon5549% games−3.6% vs expected
Suzanne Wortmann + Corinne Viso2344% games−4.1% vs expected
Suzanne Wortmann + Darilyn Baudoin4645% games−10.8% vs expected
Shelly Labbe + Amy Slate5166% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Rubenstein + Donna Mitchell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Pixley
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheila Gordon
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brenda Katzmarzyk
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Corinne Viso
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Suzanne Wortmann
36W–54L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Darilyn Baudoin
11W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Kyle Barker
18W–55L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Amy Slate
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Donna Mitchell
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Carole Wilkins
27W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Melanie McCall
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Shelly Labbe
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Kelly Bauder
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Pam Farmer
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Rubenstein
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.