Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-17vs Kreis - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Madison / Van Hughes vs Anna Kreis / Kelly Dempsey1-6, 4-6
2024-12-04vs Andresen - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Van Hughes vs Mandy Blair / Valerie Wilson6-4, 6-3
2024-11-18vs Anderson - RS ClayLost 02
L#2 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Thuy Nguyen vs Maria Bush / Sam Richardson3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Tanya Leigh Shaffer vs Erin Rhone / Lauren Anderson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-30vs Escambia/Marsach/18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Mcclurd / Van Hughes vs Cherie Tan / Shannon Schluter1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMarina Agadzi / Bonnie Bucco vs Jennifer Jackson / Beata Antal3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-23vs Andresen - PCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Tanya Leigh Shaffer vs Mandy Blair / Tanya Hughes3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Abigail Nelson
published 4.5
3.65
Tanya Leigh Shaffer
published
3.61
Eunice Ward
published
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Emily Mattes
published
3.53
Tracey Mcclurd
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Brooklyn Meadows
published 3.5
3.42
Donna Madison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Van Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Sue Nast
published
3.26
Bonnie Bucco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Mary Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Van Hughes + Mary Bryan3844% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Leigh Shaffer + Mary Bryan7361% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Mcclurd + Donna Madison3643% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Mcclurd + Marina Agadzi2447% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Mcclurd + Mary Bryan044 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Mcclurd + Van Hughes213 matchesnot enough data
Donna Madison + Van Hughes123 matchesnot enough data
Van Hughes + Marina Agadzi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abigail Nelson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Tanya Leigh Shaffer
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Eunice Ward
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Emily Mattes
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Tracey Mcclurd
63W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Donna Madison
58W–72L career · 1 line in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sue Nast
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.