Teams

KTC Pitts

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men

20 players · average NTRP 3.20 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Preetham Salehundam
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.30
Kyle Muir
published
Dennis Pulaski
published 3.5
3.25
Dillon Frets
published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Whalen
published
3.17
Kevin Wimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Thomas Tisler
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.13
Ryan Remaly
published
3.08
Russell Hardie
published
2.96
Mark Smallwood
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Curtis Edwards
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.87
Andy Hostetter
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
David Swanson
published 3
2.72
Rakib Mustafa
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Edward Kimball
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Hugh Quill
published
Jesse Raby
published
Mel Brown
published
Nicholas Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr + Preetham Salehundam134 matchesnot enough data
Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr + Kyle Muir134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Smallwood + Andy Hostetter123 matchesnot enough data
Russell Hardie + Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr123 matchesnot enough data
Andy Hostetter + David Swanson213 matchesnot enough data
Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr + Hugh Quill213 matchesnot enough data
Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr + Edward Kimball213 matchesnot enough data
Edward Kimball + Thomas Tisler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Preetham Salehundam
40W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kyle Muir
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Dennis Pulaski
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dillon Frets
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Thomas Whalen
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kevin Wimer
43W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr
44W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Thomas Tisler
71W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Ryan Remaly
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Russell Hardie
75W–40L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Mark Smallwood
48W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Curtis Edwards
51W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Andy Hostetter
44W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
David Swanson
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rakib Mustafa
21W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Edward Kimball
18W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hugh Quill
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jesse Raby
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mel Brown
2W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Moore
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.