Teams

SD 8.0 Peninsula TC/ Simmons

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter - SD · SD - 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-18vs SD LLW 8.0 ECCTA/ HwangLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Hagopian / Eric Bowers vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Jose Carlos Escalante Portillo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-11vs SD LLW 8.0 ECCTA/ HwangLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle May / Steve Potter vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Joseph Barraquio3-6, 3-6
2023-03-04vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ WestLost 02
L#2 DoublesKyle Balaban / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Paola Romo / Hoang Kim Truong6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDarlene Gallego / Steve Potter vs Tommy West / Madeleine West2-6, 0-6
2023-02-18vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ KilleenWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Hagopian / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Ricardo Estrada / Herta Ixtlahuac6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDarlene Gallego / Steve Potter vs Susan Davis / James Davis7-6, 6-4
2023-02-11vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ AlvarezWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Ray / Leah Diehl vs Mark Bauer / Roanne Manzano-Roth7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlison Hagopian / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Jacqueline Chafe / Joseph Reyes7-5, 6-3
2023-02-04vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ ChannickWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Ray / Leah Diehl vs Sandy Dielman / Rory Kish6-3, 7-5
2023-01-14vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ WestLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Michelle May vs Scot Gentry / Cynthia Herrera2-6, 4-6
2023-01-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKyle Balaban / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Isa Grimes / Kelly Jernigan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Alison Hagopian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Eric Bowers
published
3.93
Nicholas Rodrigues
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Birte Lightner
published 4
3.60
3.51
Leah Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Steve Potter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Hagopian + Nicholas Rodrigues314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alison Hagopian
171W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
4.36
Eric Bowers
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.12
4
Nicholas Rodrigues
44W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Birte Lightner
32W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Charlotte Francovalle
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Leah Diehl
61W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Steve Potter
33W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jeff Ray
20W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.