Teams

TRogovin (JCC)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-04vs DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Scanga / Caryn Craige vs Stephanie Kwon / Susan Taylor6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Tsadaka / Amy Altieri vs Janat Schramm / Geralyn McCourt7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTina Rogovin / Maria Palios vs Maureen Hussey / Ginny Starnes7-5, 7-5
2026-08-28vs LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCaryn Craige / Debra van Glish vs Olya Banchik / Anait Balasanyan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Palios / Sharon Parker vs Lizette Conover / Heather Enlow-Novitsky3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDeborah Mandel / Maria Tsadaka vs Saima Barkat / JoAnn Cho3-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCaryn Craige / Deborah Mandel vs Maureen Paterson / Natalie Costello6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Tsadaka / Tina Rogovin vs Brittany Gano / Bailey Zobel6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Cosolito / Maria Palios vs Volree Wade / Julie Swanson1-6, 4-6
2026-08-14vs SNewman (BCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Scanga / Debra van Glish vs Julie Derrico / Sheri Newman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Cosolito / Deborah Mandel vs January Crimin / Michelle Silla1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTina Rogovin / Maria Tsadaka vs Dori Cazorla / Nancy Scholz6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-07vs LDyer (Mountainbrook)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Rogovin / Caryn Craige vs Joanne Lindley / Katie White3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Tsadaka / Maria Palios vs Meghan Walker / Jamie Pearman2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Cosolito / Susan Scanga vs Serena Kossisyan-Perlman / Kay Sowers7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Caryn Craige
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Debra van Glish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Altieri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Tina Rogovin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Lisa Cosolito
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Deborah Mandel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Maria Palios
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maria Tsadaka
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sharon Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Scanga
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Rogovin + Debra van Glish4158% gamesnot enough data
Debra van Glish + Lisa Cosolito213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caryn Craige
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Debra van Glish
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Amy Altieri
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Tina Rogovin
75W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Lisa Cosolito
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
3
Deborah Mandel
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Maria Palios
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Tsadaka
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Parker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Scanga
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.