Teams

Huffhines/Rodriguez-Foster

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT M Saturday · M Open

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-14vs Cooper FC/NoelWon 20
W#1 DoublesTroy Cole / Marcos Garcia vs Andre Vahdat / Corey Noel7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Foster / Nick Smith vs Wil Saqueton / Burak Berksoy6-2, 6-3
2026-02-28vs Cooper FC/NoelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTroy Cole / Marcos Garcia vs Corey Noel / Douglas Fair6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShawn Foster / Nick Smith vs Michael Mabe / Burak Berksoy3-6, 3-6
2026-02-21vs LB Houston/PerkisonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNick Smith / Shawn Foster vs Johann Jooste / Brian Irvin6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarcos Garcia / Alen Odic vs Shane Read / STEPHAN PEISER6-4, 6-2
2026-02-14vs Cooper FC/NoelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTroy Cole / Patrick Rea vs Andre Vahdat / Trevis Bowman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShawn Foster / Mauricio Rodriguez vs Corey Noel / Wil Saqueton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-08vs LB Houston/PerkisonWon 20
W#2 DoublesMarcos Garcia / Troy Cole vs Owen Morris / STEPHAN PEISER6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShawn Foster / Nick Smith vs Brannon Perkison / Donald Miller6-4, 6-2
2026-01-10vs LB Houston/PerkisonLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Rea / Fernando Caviedes vs Rafael Valdez / Robert Novotny3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNick Smith / Marcos Garcia vs Brian Irvin / STEPHAN PEISER1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · M Open
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LB Houston/Perkison4212615159
2Huffhines/Rodriguez-Foster3381023174
3Cooper FC/Noel2471125180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.41 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alen Odic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.41
Patrick Rea
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Fernando Caviedes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shawn Foster
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Troy Cole
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Smith + Shawn Foster224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alen Odic
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Rea
12W–14L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
4.41
Fernando Caviedes
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nick Smith
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shawn Foster
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Troy Cole
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.