← Teams

MPRC-Tompkins/Mitchell

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.11 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Debra Hall
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Yan Morrissey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Kristi Tompkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Wendy Simons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Jayne Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Joann Donahue
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Lee Gates
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Dipali Dixit
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Susan Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJayne Mitchell / Amy Patton vs Ann Arp / Teufelin Traylen6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYan Morrissey / Lee Gates vs Kaie Wellman / Michele Beaman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristi Tompkins / Rita DeWeese vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick7-6, 6-1
2024-11-17Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesKristi Tompkins / Leanne Kong vs Jennifer Pultz / Mary Priester6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLee Gates / Wendy Simons vs Dar Dragoon / Kimbra Kasch6-1, 6-3
2024-11-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAnn Davidson / Joann Donahue vs Michelle Johnson / Teufelin Traylen6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLee Gates / Yan Morrissey vs Kaie Wellman / Michele Beaman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWendy Simons / Rita DeWeese vs Miriam Habafy / Shawn Sefchick6-1, 6-1
2024-10-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJayne Mitchell / Wendy Simons vs Elizabeth Burns / Della Shanley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristi Tompkins / Joann Donahue vs Cathy Koerner / Kathleen Cooney6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDipali Dixit / Debra Hall vs Sara Weinstein / Marilyn von Bergen2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-10-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKristi Tompkins / Leanne Kong vs Nancy Atkins / Mary Jesse7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Schilling / Debra Hall vs Ann Cassin / Susie Garland6-4, 7-5
2024-10-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKristi Tompkins / Debra Hall vs Karen Groenweghe / Denise Angel6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Patton / Dipali Dixit vs Christine Wall / Jennifer Wiencek1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJoann Donahue / Debra Hall vs Lisa McBee / Susan Branam6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Douglas / Jayne Mitchell vs Cricket Forsey / Cathy Valentine6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWendy Simons / Lee Gates vs Nancy Heck / Toni Kidd7-6, 6-3
2024-09-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRachel Nies / Susan Douglas vs Colleen Kellogg / Candy Dann6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Patton / Debra Hall vs Michelle DeVaughn / Kimbra Kasch3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDipali Dixit / Jayne Mitchell vs Michelle Robbins / Dar Dragoon0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Debra Hall
58W–38L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
Yan Morrissey
54W–73L career
5%95%0%
3.15
3
Kristi Tompkins
67W–79L career · type A
0%88%12%
2.96
3
Wendy Simons
33W–39L career
0%89%11%
2.96
3
Jayne Mitchell
44W–78L career
0%98%2%
2.85
3
Joann Donahue
23W–41L career
0%95%4%
2.85
3
Lee Gates
83W–68L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Dipali Dixit
40W–48L career
not enough data
—
3
Susan Douglas
23W–32L career
3%97%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.