Teams

SD 3.0 CTC (3:1)/ Hackworth

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0 WD

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-24vs SD WD LLW 3.0 Mtn View/ StanleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Vineyard / Carisa Hackworth vs Angela Cortez / Valerie Garcia2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-03vs SD 3.0 SDT&RC(3:1)/ SwirhunWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Leslie Vineyard vs Polly Kolotas / Helen Smoole6-2, 6-1
2025-01-20vs SD 3.0 Mtn View(3:1)/ BravoLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarisa Hackworth / Patricia Padilla vs Maria Salas Kazmi / Stacy Tomita1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarisa Hackworth vs Ana Trave5-7, 2-6
2025-01-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesCarisa Hackworth vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Carisa Hackworth
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.92
Alejandra Cortes
published 3
2.90
Susan Dussault
published
2.87
Leslie Vineyard
published 3
2.76
Carla Guastoni
published 3
2.75
Veronica Marti
published
2.74
2.70
Kate Shaub
published
2.65
Elizabeth Conlon
published 3
2.65
Marlis Vermehren
published
2.57
Merrie Mebust
published
2.47
Lucinda Swain
published
2.46
Anne Rinko
published 3
2.42
Patricia Padilla
published
Joi Catlin
published
Miriam Valades
published
Tara Toohey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Vineyard + Carisa Hackworth3268% gamesnot enough data
Carla Guastoni + Anne Rinko033 matchesnot enough data
Dianne Lookabaugh + Marlis Vermehren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carisa Hackworth
45W–50L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Alejandra Cortes
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Susan Dussault
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Maricarmen Inchaurrandieta
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Leslie Vineyard
30W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Carla Guastoni
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
Veronica Marti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dianne Lookabaugh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Kate Shaub
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Elizabeth Conlon
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Marlis Vermehren
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Merrie Mebust
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
Lucinda Swain
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Anne Rinko
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Patricia Padilla
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Joi Catlin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Miriam Valades
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Toohey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.