Teams

OC iTennis Cerritos - Eli - Sun1pm

2023 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Men - 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesEli Alejo / Jonathan Tsang vs Kevin Tu / Kyle Vo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / John Nguyen vs Anand Jethva / Christopher Contreras5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / Wataru Takahashi vs Matthew Heys / Adrian Cole0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Robles / Peter Hsu vs Sean Batten / Paul G Batten2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesEli Alejo / John Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAaron Robles / Wataru Takahashi vs Mostafa Elmallah / Drake Sullivan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEli Alejo / James Lucero vs Brian Lee / Anand Jethva0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesEli Alejo / Mathew Gonzales vs Francesco Nguyen / Kevin Tu6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAaron Robles / Wataru Takahashi vs Justin Tee / Truman Nguyen6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / Jonathan Tsang vs Tanner Sirota / Kevin Tu6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJonathan Tsang / James Lucero vs Brian Lee / Daniel Tat2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / James Lucero vs Adrian Cole / Drake Sullivan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Men - 4.5 - 4.0 - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
An Pham
published 4.5
4.26
Eli Alejo
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
James Lucero
published 4.5
3.88
Jonathan Tsang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Aaron Robles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Peter Hsu
published
3.73
Lanel Ray de Paz
published
3.48
Gregory Oliver
published 3.5
Mathew Gonzales
published
Wataru Takahashi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Tsang + Eli Alejo2447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
An Pham
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Eli Alejo
97W–73L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
James Lucero
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Tsang
50W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Aaron Robles
104W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Peter Hsu
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Lanel Ray de Paz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Gregory Oliver
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Mathew Gonzales
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wataru Takahashi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.