← Teams

NWW-NTC-Wilson

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Michelle Leonatti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Karen Baebler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Results5 ties
2022-11-11Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Wilson / Michelle Leonatti vs Anne Corsano / Tracey Hsia6-4, 6-2
2022-11-06Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKaren Baebler / Shino Hyde vs Andra Addison / Monika Dalkin6-1, 6-1
2022-10-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKaren Baebler / Michelle Leonatti vs Jane Simoni / Karina Walters3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-25Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKaren Baebler / Terri Weintraub vs Yao Bailey / Laurie Furumasu7-6, 6-2
2022-09-11Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKaren Baebler / Carmen Dolfo-Garrison vs Andra Addison / Susan Lammers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Michelle Leonatti
73W–39L career
2%98%0%
4.13
4.5
Karen Baebler
105W–78L career
49%51%0%
3.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.