Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.5W/Baeza/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Claire Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.12
Alyssa Hinojos
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5
Ellen Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Guadalupe Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Isela Rayon
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
Jassivy Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Margaret Baeza
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Ramona Beard
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Rossana Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarahi Najera
usually #2 Singles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ursula Morawietz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Yazmin Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz14957% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12656% gamesnot enough data
Yazmin Pineda + Jassivy Hernandez11658% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz7356% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ellen Hughes6261% gamesnot enough data
Claire Brandon + Ellen Hughes2548% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Guadalupe Castillo5262% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Margaret Baeza3447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Brandon
36W–46L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alyssa Hinojos
41W–46L career · 12 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Ellen Hughes
74W–86L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerla Gallardo
96W–62L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Guadalupe Castillo
96W–65L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Guadalupe Saenz
71W–59L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Isela Rayon
57W–46L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
35W–28L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jassivy Hernandez
55W–42L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanette Tan
36W–51L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Baeza
23W–26L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramona Beard
54W–60L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rossana Roacho
123W–115L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarahi Najera
69W–38L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ursula Morawietz
40W–27L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yazmin Pineda
42W–37L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.