Teams

Freeman/40s/5.5/NC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesChantel Freeman / Blair Edwards vs Molly Burns / Lauren Tagesen6-4, 6-1
2025-09-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesBlair Edwards / Sarah Mitchell vs Nela Otero / Jennifer Steen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Mitchell / Blair Edwards vs Chelsea Clement / Lisa McCoy4-6, 3-6
2025-08-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Mitchell / Blair Edwards vs Marilyn Keller / Lisa McCoy6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Freeman/40s/5.5/NC4312921195
2Klocek/40s/5.5/PAC3491227209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Chantel Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.85
Genna Donnes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Abby Morse
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.40
Christin Vilardo
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 2.5
2.18
Blair Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jennifer Sillars
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Lynette Lobell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Melissa Lama
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Mignon Hess
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Natalie Oubre
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Morse + Chantel Freeman5260% gamesnot enough data
Lynette Lobell + Melissa Lama0721% gamesnot enough data
Christin Vilardo + Melissa Lama1429% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Sillars + Sarah Mitchell134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Sillars + Christin Vilardo224 matchesnot enough data
Genna Donnes + Sarah Mitchell224 matchesnot enough data
Genna Donnes + Christin Vilardo404 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Mitchell + Blair Edwards224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chantel Freeman
54W–48L career · 62 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Genna Donnes
16W–21L career · 20 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Abby Morse
23W–43L career · 43 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Christin Vilardo
21W–31L career · 22 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Blair Edwards
6W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jennifer Sillars
13W–34L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynette Lobell
10W–22L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Lama
5W–25L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mignon Hess
33W–43L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Oubre
6W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Mitchell
11W–35L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.