Teams

GTC BLACK

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs SKY REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuresh Gevaran / Ian Graffagna vs Bob Sullivan / Doug Wiley6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Silver / Barry Jerebker vs Rockwell Pearson / Brett Abernathy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-29vs WP ORANGELost 01
L#3 DoublesBruce Silver / Daniel Stover vs Greg Hamilton / Tim Fitz1-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs DTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoger Montoya / Ian Graffagna vs Morris Askenazi / Steven Ellstrom6-3, 6-4
2023-05-17vs EM REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesIan Graffagna / Roger Montoya vs David May / Gregory Fritsch7-6, 6-2
2023-05-05vs CP REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesRoger Montoya / Ian Graffagna vs Tony Church / Jeremy Carman6-4, 6-2
2023-04-26vs CACM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBruce Silver / David Baker vs Mitchell Morrissey / Jonah Staller4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Maaliki / Roger Montoya vs Craig Claxton / Doug Aglietti3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Suresh Gevaran
published 4
3.98
3.79
Ian Graffagna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Roger Montoya
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
3.62
Bruce Silver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Gary Abrams
published
Daniel Stover
published 3.5
Joshua Rozman
published
Michael Maaliki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Abrams + Sebastian DeBenedittis6356% games+0.1% vs expected
Roger Montoya + Ian Graffagna17657% games−0.9% vs expected
Roger Montoya + Suresh Gevaran7455% games−6.7% vs expected
Joshua Rozman + Bruce Silver404 matchesnot enough data
Gary Abrams + Bruce Silver123 matchesnot enough data
Roger Montoya + Bruce Silver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suresh Gevaran
67W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
4.10
Nikolai Voitsekhovitch
23W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Ian Graffagna
24W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Roger Montoya
70W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Sebastian DeBenedittis
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Bruce Silver
287W–193L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
Gary Abrams
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Daniel Stover
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joshua Rozman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Maaliki
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.