Teams

Adams 18 3.5W Singles Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.5 Women Singles Tues PM

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 SinglesKristina Zemaityte vs Caroline Walker6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKathryn Fleihan vs Whitney Gansman7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKamron Moody vs Anna McGinnis7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Adams vs Anita Allis3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKathryn Fleihan vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Adams vs Rosemarie Palazzolo5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-24vs Augustine 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephanie Adams vs Misty Hilliard1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKathryn Fleihan vs Michele Gustavsson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesStacey Russo vs Anna McGinnis4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKathryn Fleihan vs Anita Allis6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKristina Zemaityte vs Danielle Laliberte7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Adams vs Rosemarie Palazzolo6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKathryn Fleihan vs Suki Gutierrez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKristina Zemaityte vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat6-4, 6-4
2025-06-03vs Augustine 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesKathryn Fleihan vs Kate Augustine1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Russo vs Misty Hilliard4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKristina Zemaityte vs Ashley Vartanian6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesStacey Russo vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristina Zemaityte vs Rosemarie Palazzolo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesStephanie Adams vs Suki Gutierrez6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Singles Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kamron Moody
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Stacey Russo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Kristina Zemaityte
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.11
Kathryn Fleihan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Stephanie Adams
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Russo + Stephanie Adams2341% games−5.7% vs expected
Kathryn Fleihan + Kamron Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kamron Moody
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Stacey Russo
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Kristina Zemaityte
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kathryn Fleihan
30W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Stephanie Adams
23W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.