Teams

CROW CANYON CC CM6.5A

2022 COMBO · Men 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-03vs CROW CANYON CC CM6.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Lourens / Paul Krueger vs Darren Rashkin / Nick Barrow6-2, 6-0
2022-10-11vs PLEASANTON CM6.5BLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Kutrosky / Paul Krueger vs ANAND MADDULA / Neerajkumar Chourasia6-7, 2-6
2022-10-01vs BLACKHAWK CC CM6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesRon Christensen / Paul Krueger vs Henry Liu / Fadhly Bey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Matt Lourens
published
3.62
Katphin Moo
published
3.40
Chad Harrison
published 3.5
3.33
Ron Christensen
published
3.19
Chris Picht
published 3.5
3.17
Carl Buettner
published 3.5
3.15
Peter Houston
published
3.14
Paul Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
David Kutrosky
published 3.5
2.80
Edward Graff
published 3
2.76
Ronnie Ghosh
published
George Masa
published 3
2.72
Pete Brown
published
2.64
Richard San Vicente
published
1.88
Alan Roth
published 2.5
William Pratt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Lourens
35W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
Katphin Moo
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Chad Harrison
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Ron Christensen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Chris Picht
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carl Buettner
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Peter Houston
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Paul Krueger
46W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
David Kutrosky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Edward Graff
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Ronnie Ghosh
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
George Masa
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pete Brown
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Richard San Vicente
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Alan Roth
1W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.88
William Pratt
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.