Teams

300 Club - Sumerlin

2022 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-20vs ALACHUA/SpinkSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnita Rajasekhar vs Angie Gomez1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Sager / Laura Muchnick vs Amy Whitaker / Linda Garcia-Crespo6-1, 6-2
2022-07-06vs ALACHUA/SpinkLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Rachael Seidler vs Rebecca McKee / Linda Garcia-Crespo5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Moehle vs Judith Bertran2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-30vs Jonesville - ZaldivarWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Laura Muchnick vs Tiffany Schmidt / Laura Davis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Kavita Rajasekhar vs Sriyani Dissanayake / Cassie Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-06-27vs Hawkstone - Fox/HowellLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Laura Muchnick vs Andrea Love / Cynthia Lewis4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Laura Peterson vs Rachael van Dyke / Jennifer Hitchcock0-6, 4-6
2022-06-26vs Hawkstone - HillWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Sylvia Spear vs Jodi Cox / Cara Duffaut6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnita Rajasekhar vs Haesuk Park6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-16vs Jonesville - ZaldivarWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Laura Muchnick vs Jessica Reddish / Kim Newsom7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLauren Moehle vs Alyssa Ray4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRachael Seidler / Victoria Verunac vs Maria Zaldivar / DAHAO LING6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnita Rajasekhar vs Hala Assar6-2, 6-1
2022-06-15vs Hawkstone - Fox/HowellLost 02
L#2 SinglesLauren Moehle vs Andrea Love3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / Patricia Woolley vs Jennifer Hitchcock / Rachael van Dyke1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Moehle vs Vimala Robinson6-3, 4-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Julie Sager
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.75
Anita Rajasekhar
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.33
Lauren Moehle
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.81
Rachael Seidler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Patricia Woolley
published
2.63
Shannon Sumerlin
published
2.45
Marianne Eberhard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Rajasekhar + Julie Sager7161% games+3.2% vs expected
Rachael Seidler + Julie Sager123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Sager
182W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
4.10
4
Anita Rajasekhar
130W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Lauren Moehle
80W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
Patricia Woolley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Shannon Sumerlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Marianne Eberhard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.