Teams

Bon Air Wade

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.29 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-11-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck Snow / Jimmy Ghaphery vs Thomas Mitchell / Sung Kang3-6, 6-7
2022-10-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Anthony Fiorenza vs Clark Halladay / Christopher Snow2-6, 0-6
2022-10-25vs Avalon WilliamsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Chuck Snow vs Bradford Baylor / Michael Shafer1-6, 2-6
2022-10-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Chuck Snow vs Jason Voigt / Warren Smigo6-3, 6-3
2022-10-11Won 20
W#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Christopher Wade vs Stuart Fulcher / Neil Perron7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Morris / Michael Blackburn vs Jeff Bosch / Majd Babik6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-04vs CCV AveryLost 02
L#1 DoublesChuck Snow / Christopher Wade vs Charles Valentine / Christopher Snow3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Matthew Morris vs Clark Halladay / Scott Harrison1-6, 1-6
2022-09-27vs ACAC RichmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnthony Fiorenza / Jimmy Ghaphery vs Sung Kang / Jay Nelson5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDon Caffery / Michael Blackburn vs Alex Neuwelt / Jeff Richman2-6, 4-6
2022-09-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Chuck Snow vs Bradford Baylor / Tyler Crone6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Anthony Fiorenza vs Scott Kim / Warren Smigo6-4, 6-3
2022-09-06vs ACAC HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Bennett / Chuck Snow vs Stuart Fulcher / Ralph Agpaoa6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Fiorenza
published 4.5
4.23
Chuck Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Christopher Wade
published 4
3.97
Jimmy Ghaphery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
John Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
3.68
Matthew Morris
published
3.59
Michael Blackburn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chuck Snow + John Bennett465750% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Fiorenza
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Chuck Snow
172W–207L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Christopher Wade
9W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
4.12
4.5
Jimmy Ghaphery
61W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
John Bennett
180W–157L career · 3 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.86
4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Matthew Morris
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.68
4
Michael Blackburn
172W–174L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.