Teams

HOLBROOK PK 40AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Mary Graber
published
4.43
Janise Taylor
published
4.40
4.26
Irene Otten
published
4.23
Mia Banks
published
4.23
Andrea Barnes
published 4.5
4.22
Paula Moser
published
4.22
Carrie Friedberg
published 4.5
4.20
Pratima Rao
published
4.18
Zeynep Chasseray
published
4.15
Alicia van Fleteren
published 4.5
4.15
Catherine Vowles
published 4.5
4.14
Liza Geary
published
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
published
4.05
Suzanne Jochner
published
Elizabeth Tripaldi
published
Jane Solomon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Barnes + Leslie Airola-Murveit7076% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Airola-Murveit + Janise Taylor404 matchesnot enough data
Pratima Rao + Irene Otten213 matchesnot enough data
Alicia van Fleteren + Sumeeta Vasishta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Graber
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
Janise Taylor
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Leslie Airola-Murveit
13W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Irene Otten
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Mia Banks
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Andrea Barnes
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Paula Moser
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Carrie Friedberg
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Pratima Rao
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.20
Zeynep Chasseray
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alicia van Fleteren
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
4.15
4.5
Catherine Vowles
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
Liza Geary
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Suzanne Jochner
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Elizabeth Tripaldi
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Solomon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.