Teams

Bates/Ternes/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.5 Men - Sunday 12:30 PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-16vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesShane Hutton / Daniel Schafer vs Connor Malchow / Spartacus Crawford6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristopher Bates vs Ryan Hitt6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Daniel Oxford6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-09vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Bates / Daniel Schafer vs Ryan Hitt / Daniel Oxford3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCharlie Sevier vs Montgomery Jackson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBradley Ternes / Jake Ward vs James Fong / Madison Mummert6-2, 6-4
2025-11-06vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacob Parrish / Jake Ward vs John Faldetta / Scott Collins6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristopher Bates vs Mark Sargent6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDaniel Schafer vs Robert Grimes6-2, 6-3
2025-11-02vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesShane Hutton / Andrew Solarski vs Doug Story / Robert Grimes6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Charles McCray6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJake Ward / Daniel Schafer vs Michael McKeown / Igor Shalkevich7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDiego Salinas vs Edmund Sauer3-5
2025-10-19vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesJacob Parrish / Bradley Ternes vs Doug Story / Daniel Oxford2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristopher Bates vs Michael McKeown3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJake Ward / Charlie Sevier vs Harrison Norton / Montgomery Jackson6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAndrew Solarski vs Mark Sargent4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiego Salinas / Shane Hutton vs Igor Shalkevich / Madison Mummert6-3, 6-1
2025-10-12vs Sargent/McKeown/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bates / Andrew Solarski vs Charles McCray / James Fong7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacob Parrish vs Jacob D'Aleo6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJake Ward / Daniel Schafer vs Harrison Norton / Montgomery Jackson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBradley Ternes vs Mark Sargent6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDiego Salinas / Charlie Sevier vs Robert Grimes / Connor Malchow7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men - Sunday 12:30 PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bates/Ternes/Nashville33181230241
2Sargent/McKeown/Nashville33121840256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Jacob Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.49
Bradley Ternes
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.38
Charlie Sevier
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Christopher Bates
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.37
Jake Ward
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.30
Shane Hutton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
Andrew Solarski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Daniel Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.21
Diego Salinas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Parrish
25W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
Bradley Ternes
18W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Charlie Sevier
17W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Christopher Bates
16W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
Jake Ward
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Shane Hutton
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Solarski
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Daniel Schafer
8W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Diego Salinas
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.