Teams

CROW CANYON CC 40AW3.5B-DT

2021 ADULT 40 & Over · Women's 3.5 Daytime

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-10vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Baker / Carolyn Rovner vs Mary Reese / Flora Tang6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-08-03vs DIABLO CC 40AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Rovner / Leda Lim vs Vicky Cadet / Kay Warneke6-4, 6-1
2021-07-29vs BLACKHAWK CC 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Pfeiffer / Carolyn Rovner vs Jenna James / Jennifer Jernstedt5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Margaret Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Pia Moore
published
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.31
Jill Pfeiffer
published
3.23
Carolyn Rovner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Leda Lim
published
3.16
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Pfeiffer + Dana Kruger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 16 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
Pia Moore
67W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Jill Pfeiffer
44W–42L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Carolyn Rovner
27W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Leda Lim
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.