Teams

SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Bucky

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · SD - Women - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Webster000000
2SD 4.0 Balboa TC/ Davis000000
3SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Bucky000000
4SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Gambale000000
5SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Nguyen000000
6SD 4.0 Peninsula TC/ Lightner000000
7SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Kauffman000000
8SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Hanson000000
9SD 4.0 Universiy City RC/ Fitzgerald000000
10SD 4.0 Coronado HS/ Hammond000000
11SD 4.0 Barnes TC/ Carey000000
12SD 4.0 Barnes / Williams000000
13SD 4.0 Mtn View/ Fairbank000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Carolyn Pringle
published 4
3.88
Carla Charfauros
published 4
3.79
Jenelle Aris
published
3.75
Helen Farr
published 4
3.71
Nichole Dolinsky
published 4
3.69
3.65
Debra Reilly
published 4
3.56
Nichola Diggs
published
3.48
Sarah Bruno
published
3.47
Darcy Karpman
published 3.5
3.46
Jessica Shehab
published 3.5
3.38
Jennifer Bucky
published 3.5
3.32
Clare Lemon
published 3.5
Kelli Eliopoulos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bucky + Jessica Shehab4161% games+13.0% vs expected
Darcy Karpman + Sarah Bruno4165% games+9.4% vs expected
Carolyn Pringle + Jessica Shehab3351% games+6.3% vs expected
Sarah Bruno + Jessica Shehab6457% games+6.2% vs expected
Jenelle Aris + Michelle Strachan8162% games+4.4% vs expected
Darcy Karpman + Jennifer Bucky171551% games+0.9% vs expected
Jennifer Bucky + Michelle Strachan5254% games+0.9% vs expected
Debra Reilly + Nichole Dolinsky314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Pringle
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Carla Charfauros
17W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
Jenelle Aris
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Helen Farr
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Nichole Dolinsky
100W–43L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Michelle Strachan
66W–40L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Debra Reilly
121W–145L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Nichola Diggs
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Sarah Bruno
21W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Darcy Karpman
94W–53L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Jessica Shehab
82W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Jennifer Bucky
67W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Clare Lemon
117W–140L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Kelli Eliopoulos
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.