Teams

Linda Pongsugree

2023 Loudoun Tri-Level 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-27vs KAPLAN/ZIMMERMANLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Michelle O'Brien vs Nancy Sicairos / Ashley Plexico0-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs KAPLAN/ZIMMERMANLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeri Fahlgren / Jenelle Langen vs Erin Kaplan / Darla Butler6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-31vs KAPLAN/ZIMMERMANLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaureen Bornholdt / Jill Poretz vs Erin Kaplan / Erin Green2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-23vs KAPLAN/ZIMMERMANWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Fahlgren / Jenelle Langen vs Renee Wall / Melissa Johnson6-1, 6-2
2023-05-15vs KAPLAN/ZIMMERMANWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Kimianne Lee vs Leanne Drake / Kelli O'Donnell7-6, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.62
Gina Ryan
published
3.60
Jill Poretz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Jennifer Larner
published
3.59
Teri Fahlgren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Julie Kane
published
3.38
Maureen Bornholdt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Tina Le
published
3.30
Mary Berkowitz
published
3.30
Alexis Martin
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Krueger
published
3.17
Megan Sultan
published
2.70
Sharon DiRenzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenelle Langen + Teri Fahlgren131052% games+0.5% vs expected
Maureen Bornholdt + Sharon DiRenzo5648% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Bornholdt + Jill Poretz4353% gamesnot enough data
Julie Kane + Megan Sultan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Gina Ryan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Larner
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Teri Fahlgren
114W–115L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Julie Kane
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Maureen Bornholdt
72W–133L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tina Le
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Mary Berkowitz
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alexis Martin
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Mary Krueger
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Megan Sultan
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Sharon DiRenzo
103W–140L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.