Teams

IE-Bear Creek-Chicas Bella-Haggerty

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#3 DoublesLori Borresen / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty vs Sheila Palmer / Jordana Ridland4-6, 0-6
2024-11-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Alexander / Linda Hockenbery vs Linda Brown / Heather Smith0-6, 0-6
2024-10-27vs IE-TCC-CroushoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Jane Bailey-Sease vs Tisha Hollosy / Lisa Hawkins3-6, 0-6
2024-10-26vs IE-TCC-CroushoreLost 01
L#3 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Kimberly Geske vs Mary Herbers Eme / Rebecca Mills2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJane Bailey-Sease / Linda Hockenbery vs Sharon Baker / Rebekah Cross7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-06vs IE-Canyon Lake-HelbockLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Britton / Linda Hockenbery vs Carrie Collins / Danette Conlin3-6, 2-6
2024-09-28vs IE-Canyon Lake-HelbockWon 10
W#3 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Rebekah Cross vs Jennifer Helbock / Kim Hoyer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs IE-MTC-Top Spinners-ShelterWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Anderson / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty vs Eir Fileccia / Leah Montesinos7-5, 6-2
2024-09-15vs IE-LLW-Andulka-PereyraLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsey Anderson / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty vs Rei Spickelmier / Patricia Marshall2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Judy Alexander
published
2.61
Jane Bailey-Sease
published
2.58
Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
Heidi Schumaker
published
2.49
Danna Cobbe
published 2.5
2.38
Linda Hockenbery
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Aneta Duvall
published 2.5
Barbara Osland
published 2.5
2.21
Michelle Fogal
published
Natalie LeBaron
published
Susan Britton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Hockenbery + Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Alexander
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.79
Jane Bailey-Sease
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%22%78%
2.61
3
Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
19W–83L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Heidi Schumaker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Danna Cobbe
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%52%48%
2.49
3
Linda Hockenbery
34W–106L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Aneta Duvall
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Barbara Osland
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Fogal
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.21
Natalie LeBaron
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Britton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.