Teams

Southern: Armonk Tennis Club

2023 65&Over Men · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-31vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Hanchrow / Richard Liebman vs John Hoffman / Steve Geller6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhilip Boxer / Roger Freed vs Alan Zahn / Joseph Karales2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Dalton / Paul Noto vs Robert Slotoroff / Steven Sokol7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlec Roberts / James Hanchrow vs Steve Geller / John Hoffman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Dalton / Andrew Rubien vs Joseph Karales / Sam Markovits0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Kasarsky / Peter Chavez vs Glen Andersen / Robert Slotoroff6-1, 6-4
2023-07-27vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Hanchrow / Michael Dalton vs Steve Geller / Michael DelPrete2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Schlecker / Philip Boxer vs Alan Zahn / Sam Markovits6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoger Freed / Alec Roberts vs Glen Andersen / Arthur Phillips2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-13vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Noto / Richard Liebman vs Arthur Phillips / Glen Andersen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Dalton / Andrew Rubien vs Alan Zahn / Peter Fiore6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhilip Boxer / David Schlecker vs Florin Parlia / Robert Slotoroff7-6, 7-5
2023-06-29vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Hanchrow / Richard Liebman vs Sam Markovits / Kevin O'Rourke6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Dalton / Andrew Rubien vs Arthur Phillips / Glen Andersen2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Schlecker / Allan Silverstein vs Florin Parlia / Joseph Karales6-2, 6-0
2023-06-15vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Hanchrow / Philip Boxer vs Michael DelPrete / Sam Markovits7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Schlecker / Andrew Rubien vs Arthur Phillips / Glen Andersen6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeter Chavez / Jason Kasarsky vs Joseph Karales / Florin Parlia2-6, 4-6
2023-05-25vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Hanchrow / David Schlecker vs John Hoffman / Jones Perry6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPeter Chavez / Harry Keely vs Steven Sokol / Charles Bauer1-6, 4-6
2023-05-04vs CRRC: VIRILE OLD MENLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Schlecker / Jason Kasarsky vs John Hoffman / Alan Zahn4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJames Hanchrow / Michael Dalton vs Joseph Karales / Richard Getler7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Chavez / Alec Roberts vs Robert Bull / Robert Slotoroff1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CRRC: VIRILE OLD MEN08121227208
2Southern: Armonk Tennis Club08121228224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alec Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Andrew Rubien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Schlecker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Alan Kravetz
published 3.5
3.65
Philip Boxer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
James Hanchrow
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.64
Michael Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.50
Jason Kasarsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Peter Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Mark Gressle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Noto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Liebman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Boxer + James Hanchrow4350% games+2.2% vs expected
Richard Liebman + James Hanchrow7159% gamesnot enough data
Paul Noto + Michael Dalton4452% gamesnot enough data
David Schlecker + Philip Boxer4356% gamesnot enough data
Michael Dalton + James Hanchrow3345% gamesnot enough data
Alan Kravetz + Michael Dalton3248% gamesnot enough data
Alan Kravetz + Peter Chavez314 matchesnot enough data
Alec Roberts + Philip Boxer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alec Roberts
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Andrew Rubien
23W–22L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David Schlecker
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alan Kravetz
86W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.67
Philip Boxer
20W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
James Hanchrow
60W–48L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
Michael Dalton
69W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Jason Kasarsky
12W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Peter Chavez
36W–78L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.28
Mark Gressle
21W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Paul Noto
83W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Liebman
23W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.