Teams

Awesome Blossom

2024 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKEND WOMEN · 3.5 Women Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Marina Henkes
published
3.32
Hope Baker
published 3.5
3.25
Yvette Schleiger
published
3.23
Mary Cirilo
published
3.18
3.11
Karen Pozza
published
3.04
Jean Pace
published
2.98
Theresa Holland
published
2.95
KATHERINE GILLIGAN
published
Maria Trench
published
Michelle Magana
published
Patricia Dilling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Pozza + Marina Henkes4255% games+9.9% vs expected
Karen Pozza + Yvette Schleiger2348% games−0.6% vs expected
Jean Pace + Mary Cirilo1640% games−1.5% vs expected
Mary Cirilo + Marina Henkes2546% games−2.8% vs expected
Jean Pace + Marina Henkes134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Pozza + Mary Cirilo134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Pozza + Theresa Holland044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marina Henkes
34W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Hope Baker
16W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
Yvette Schleiger
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Mary Cirilo
24W–81L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Myriam Chavez Latimer
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Karen Pozza
16W–28L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jean Pace
3W–19L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Theresa Holland
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
KATHERINE GILLIGAN
20W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Maria Trench
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Magana
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Dilling
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.