Teams

Dominion Club - Long

2026 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-07vs ACAC NeumannWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Marcus / Cynthia Mistretta vs Judy Duke / Hilary Brodsky6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Long / Sharon Moorefield vs Margaret Thompson / Karen Grimes6-2, 6-2
2026-07-21vs Hermitage - HarcumLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Davis / Michele Limoges vs Teki Hall / Beth Stinson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Eldridge / Cynthia Mistretta vs Judi Baker / Kathy Meyer6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Long / Sheri Carlyle vs Barbara Grove / Kathy Harcum6-4, 7-5
2026-07-20vs Salisbury KimWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Underwood / Nathalie Stephens vs Melissa Brunner-Brown / Stacey Piotrowski6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Davis / Sheri Carlyle vs Nancy Sullivan / Robin Sorensen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Long / Michele Limoges vs Annmarie Strachan / Cheryl Cacciotti3-6, 2-6
2026-07-13vs MTC Downing 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDeborah Eldridge / Nathalie Stephens vs Sandra Farrow / Carol Beth Cook4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRhonda Underwood / Sharon Moorefield vs Annella Safford Baker / Norma Kimbrel6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHeidi Collier / Sheri Carlyle vs Melissa Miller / Anne Gilfillan6-2, 6-1
2026-07-06vs Avalon DavisWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Long / Heidi Collier vs Karen Devalk / Wendy Daniel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Mistretta / Michele Limoges vs Donna Wade / Julie Ranson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Moorefield / Nathalie Stephens vs Renita Randolph / Leslie Gayne5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-22vs Stonehenge SnavelyWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Susan Long vs Terri Estes / Donna Bull6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Marcus / Michele Limoges vs Jane Shives / Ann Falk6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNathalie Stephens / Annette Vignone vs Debbie Fausey / Betty Snavely6-1, 6-0
2026-06-18vs Raintree Stahling - YWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Eldridge / Rhonda Underwood vs Mona Stahling / Karen Wood6-3, 6-4
2026-06-15vs ACAC~LockhartLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Vignone / Stephanie Marcus vs Catherine Estes / Robin Petrine6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Eldridge / Heather Long vs Jane Riddle / Eileen Cerny6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Mistretta / Sheri Carlyle vs Linda Larue / Denise Weisberg6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACAC~Lockhart7119514166
2Westwood 55 Ladies - Gilman7117717183
3Dominion Club - Long6216820182
4Hermitage - Harcum6216821187
5Townsend 55+ 7.0 wkDAY5316823209
6Avalon Davis53141023222
7Raintree Evans44141023203
8Salisbury Kim44131124208
9Burkwood MooreFun35111330230
10MTC Downing 7.02691532233
11ACAC Neumann2651939268
12Raintree Stahling - Y1732143263
13Stonehenge Snavely0832143261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Heidi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Rhonda Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Deborah Eldridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Sharon Moorefield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Nathalie Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Cynthia Mistretta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Sheri Carlyle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Michele Limoges
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Annette Vignone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Collier + Rhonda Underwood3251% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Underwood + Sharon Moorefield3248% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Carlyle + Heidi Collier404 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Carlyle + Michele Limoges123 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Eldridge + Rhonda Underwood123 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Eldridge + Sharon Moorefield213 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Eldridge + Cynthia Mistretta213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Collier
118W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Rhonda Underwood
96W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Deborah Eldridge
16W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Sharon Moorefield
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Nathalie Stephens
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cynthia Mistretta
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Sheri Carlyle
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Michele Limoges
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Annette Vignone
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.