Teams

CDTA W 18&OW3.0 7.MT Pal Snyder Sat 2 $25

CDTA 2Winter 18 & Over W · E

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
L#1 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs Catherine Battin / Patricia Urbaniak6-7, 3-5
L#1 SinglesSusan Xu vs Denise Barton1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelleen Thut / Miriam Wozniewski vs Lisa Levy / Lori Lamey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVanessa Harris / Miriam Wozniewski vs Michelle Yuen / Ashley Dempsey0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Judy Dluzen vs Dana Anderson / Dina DeLaurentis3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Snyder / Beverly Vacval vs Patty Ohle / Lori Guba6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Lange / Miriam Wozniewski vs Leena Bhat / Frances Hopps6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCherrie Han / Gabrielle Esposito vs Julie Gordon / Shelly Costabile6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Lange / Jacqueline Lakely vs Teresa Simchak / Kristin Wittman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCherrie Han / Gabrielle Esposito vs Lori Lamey / Joyce Nakamura6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / Kelleen Thut vs Irene Okada / Michele Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Xu vs Beatrisa Paz1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Dluzen / Miriam Wozniewski vs Aubrey Ellis / Katie Sullivan5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs Laura Breakstone / Nancy Nora5-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Gabrielle Esposito vs Kim Vandegrift / Karen Kos6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeth Zawilenski / Miriam Wozniewski vs Julie Gottshall / Kristin MacCarthy3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSharon Snyder / Catherine Lange vs GERELMAA BUDMANDAKH / Meg Hui6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSusan Xu vs Tina Cid0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Vanessa Harris vs Jeanne Tromp / Stephanie Adam2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Lange / Susan Xu vs Selma Bouhl / Kimberly Barry1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / Beverly Vacval vs Vicki Johnson / Dina DeLaurentis2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Zawilenski / Catherine Lange vs Kim Vandegrift / Jamie Rauscher6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Jacqueline Lakely vs Amanda Marijanovic / Jude Sharp2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Xu vs Monika Thadhani6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Snyder / Miriam Wozniewski vs Laurie Woolverton / Patty Ohle6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Catherine Lange vs Mary Kaczmarek / Simone Brown6-4, 6-5
L#2 DoublesGabrielle Esposito / Beth Zawilenski vs Christie Jordan / Jeanne Tromp1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesCatherine Lange / Sharon Snyder vs Michelle Michaels / Susan Walsh6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Judy Dluzen vs Anjana Dalal / Kristin Walter0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBeth Zawilenski / Gabrielle Esposito vs Jan James-Calvert / Julie Lawin0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSusan Xu vs MARY GALLAGHER5-7, 3-2
L#2 DoublesVanessa Harris / Beverly Vacval vs Chrissy Scott / Anna Klemm0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OW3.0 2.MT Chi Brown 1 Sun 2 $30113431337395
2CDTA W 18&OW3.0 1.MT Bann Gordon Sun 12 $25113391737362
3CDTA W 18&OW3.0 6.Centennial Lam Fri 7:30 $2086292760468
4CDTA W 18&OW3.0 4.Tam Wolff Sun 3 $2286302662514
5CDTA W 18&OW3.0 8.Lake Bluff Sherman Sat 4 $2077213574525
6CDTA W 18&OW3.0 7.MT Pal Snyder Sat 2 $2559243272539
7CDTA W 18&OW3.0 5.Centennial Cohen Sun 3 $20311203677569
8CDTA W 18&OW3.0 3.MT Chi Brown 2 Sun 2 $30311183881550

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Sharon Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.07
2.93
Catherine Lange
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.90
Beth Zawilenski
published 3
2.80
Cherrie Han
published 3
2.76
Kelleen Thut
published 3
2.70
Vanessa Harris
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.60
Gabrielle Esposito
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.48
Beverly Vacval
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.30
Judy Dluzen
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Sheri Levine
published
Susan Xu
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Tina Han
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherrie Han + Catherine Lange11452% games+14.7% vs expected
Jacqueline Lakely + Sharon Snyder181454% games+11.1% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Beth Zawilenski4651% games+4.5% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Jacqueline Lakely5646% games+1.6% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Sharon Snyder13755% games+0.2% vs expected
Catherine Lange + Jacqueline Lakely9954% games−0.4% vs expected
Kelleen Thut + Beth Zawilenski7748% games−2.3% vs expected
Cherrie Han + Sharon Snyder121647% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Snyder
97W–93L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.19
3
Jacqueline Lakely
57W–54L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Catherine Lange
80W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Beth Zawilenski
28W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Cherrie Han
74W–97L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kelleen Thut
65W–104L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Vanessa Harris
22W–34L career · 8 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Gabrielle Esposito
13W–28L career · 7 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Beverly Vacval
40W–107L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.48
Judy Dluzen
16W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.30
Miriam Wozniewski
39W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheri Levine
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Xu
7W–15L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Han
5W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.