Teams

NJ RED

2021 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-20vs CP REDWon 21
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Trevor Updegraff vs Ian McCusker / Jeremy Behm-Meyer7-5, 7-6
L#1 Male SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Brian Williams4-6, 6-7
W#2 Male SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Mark Kroll6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-13vs WP GOLDWon 21
W#1 Male DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Craig Hoeltgen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 Male SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Grant Glenn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 Male SinglesTrevor Updegraff vs Felipe Quiroga3-6, 0-6
2021-07-06vs DTC REDWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Peter Ehrlich / Philip Dankner6-1, 6-0
W#2 Male SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Peter Wright6-1, 6-0
2021-06-29vs BRMST REDWon 10
W#2 Male SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Spencer Bouck6-2, 6-2
2021-06-22vs WP REDSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesTrevor Updegraff / Brandon Jacquez vs Matthew Hooper / Clint Jones3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 Male SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Bruce Chung6-3, 6-4
2021-06-08vs CP GREENWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Trevor Updegraff vs Scott Zeller / Daniel Greer6-1, 6-2
W#1 Male SinglesBrian DeCorte vs Wayne Mitchel6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MEN 4.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ RED6014410124
2CP RED4213512131
3DTC RED4211718153
4WP GOLD3310820158
5WP RED2461228187
6CP GREEN1561227199
7BRMST RED1531530185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Nelsen
published 5
4.49
Connor Ohlsen
usually #1 Male Singles 50%, also #2 Male Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
published 4.5
4.33
Brandon Jacquez
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Trevor Updegraff
usually #1 Male Doubles 75%, also #2 Male Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Brian DeCorte
usually #1 Male Singles 60%, also #2 Male Singles 40% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connor Ohlsen + Craig Hoeltgen11360% games+5.3% vs expected
Craig Hoeltgen + Brian DeCorte314 matchesnot enough data
Trevor Updegraff + Brandon Jacquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brandon Nelsen
39W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
67W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
Brandon Jacquez
66W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Trevor Updegraff
45W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Brian DeCorte
58W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.