Teams

Donellan-Manor 3.5

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-07vs Korolkoff - Chicks With SticksWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelley Donellan / Sherifa Fahmy vs Sandy Horowitz / Patricia Rose6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDiana DePaul / Cybelle Long vs Desiree Nichtula / Jody Amann1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Anson / Katie Poulos vs Lisa Raker / Kristen Moshyedi6-4, 6-2
2024-10-21vs Franklin - BCC 3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Johnson / Cybelle Long vs Shari Gronvall / Cariza McCarthy4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Valencia / Maureen Smith vs Laura O'Keefe / Beata Glover Salamon6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDawn Willard / Patty Lynch vs Amanda Franklin / Astrid Ruggeri6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Kelley Donellan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Dawn Willard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Melisssa Hacopian
published
Diana DePaul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Melissa Valencia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Cybelle Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Joan Anson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Poulos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherifa Fahmy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Smith + Melissa Valencia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelley Donellan
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Dawn Willard
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Melisssa Hacopian
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Diana DePaul
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Smith
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Melissa Valencia
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Cybelle Long
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Joan Anson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Katie Poulos
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Patty Lynch
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sherifa Fahmy
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.