Teams

JDerrico (BCC)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-19vs EKennard (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesHolly Disser vs Marissa Kleber6-4, 6-3
2023-07-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesJulie Derrico vs Margaret Campbell7-6, 6-0
2023-07-05Won 20
W#1 SinglesHolly Disser vs Sarah Zolper6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Derrico vs Nicole Brown6-2, 7-6
2023-07-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJulie Derrico vs Jennifer Quesada6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-14vs EKennard (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 SinglesHolly Disser vs Laura Grant6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJulie Derrico vs Kimberly Rupnarine5-7, 2-6
2023-05-31Won 20
W#2 SinglesHolly Disser vs Jennifer Quesada6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJulie Derrico vs Katie Hilborn6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Holly Disser
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.49
Jennifer Ison
published
3.48
Michelle Lynch
published
3.31
Christina Pardi
published 3.5
3.16
Julie Derrico
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Amy Marsh
published 3
April Pacheco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Derrico + Holly Disser5159% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Ison + Michelle Lynch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Disser
184W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
4.04
Jennifer Ison
31W–38L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Michelle Lynch
31W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Christina Pardi
38W–46L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Julie Derrico
86W–94L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Amy Marsh
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.04
April Pacheco
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.