Teams

Liberty Park Terminetters

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W AM

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-01vs Park City Honey DeucesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Plumb / Emily Scalley vs Candy Friedli / Gina Williams6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLindsey Bullen / Megan Curtis vs Melissa Soltesz / Jessica Mccurdy1-6, 5-7
2026-05-20vs SunPro Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Scalley / Marie Gardner vs Warintorn Fowkes / Yvette George6-1, 6-3
2026-05-11vs Wasatch Hills Tennis GalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Murdock / Rebecca Moore vs Melissa Jardine / Lauren Bickmore3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Whisenant / Lindsey Bullen vs Gretchen Pettey / Maegan Orchard1-6, 2-6
2026-05-04vs Wasatch High School-Kelly/NielsenWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Scalley / Brooke Murdock vs Michelle Nielsen / Kathey Maxfield6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Plumb vs Marti Blotter6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeresa Jackson / Sarah Whisenant vs Alyson Kelly / Suly Cates0-6, 1-6
2026-04-27vs Utah Valley PremierWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Kingsford / Brooke Murdock vs Autumn Bishop / Lisa Bastian6-3, 6-2
2026-04-20vs Park City Honey DeucesWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Plumb / Marie Gardner vs Christina Ngata / Gina Williams6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Scalley / Megan Curtis vs Melissa Soltesz / Karin Fojtik6-2, 6-2
2026-04-13vs SunPro Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsey Bullen / Sarah Whisenant vs Kate Dance / Mary Gunnell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-06vs Wasatch Hills Tennis GalsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Jackson / Sarah Whisenant vs Lauren Bickmore / Melissa Jardine0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Kingsford vs Megan Woodman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Niki Evans
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Elizabeth Plumb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Brooke Murdock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Marie Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Emily Scalley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.17
Suzanne Kingsford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.95
Lindsey Bullen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Sarah Whisenant
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Megan Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Evans + Emily Scalley4259% games+5.9% vs expected
Niki Evans + Marie Gardner51143% games+2.9% vs expected
Sarah Whisenant + Suzanne Kingsford2538% games+1.7% vs expected
Marie Gardner + Emily Scalley3440% games−0.0% vs expected
Emily Scalley + Suzanne Kingsford1734% games−5.1% vs expected
Emily Scalley + Sarah Whisenant2831% games−9.3% vs expected
Marie Gardner + Suzanne Kingsford1630% games−13.5% vs expected
Niki Evans + Suzanne Kingsford2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Niki Evans
52W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.62
2.5
Elizabeth Plumb
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Brooke Murdock
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Marie Gardner
20W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Emily Scalley
20W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Suzanne Kingsford
11W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Lindsey Bullen
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Sarah Whisenant
7W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Megan Curtis
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.