Teams

MCAC:WaldronM:WaldronM/WrightD

2024 Cape Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed FLT 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-05vs MCAC:MajewskiJ:MajewskiJ/MajewskiSLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Waldron / Joseph Bucchanio vs Chase Deluga / Sarah Etre5-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesDenise Wright / John Wright vs Samuel Majewski / Gail Cohen2-6, 4-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Waldron / Zachary Wright vs Ras Mariak / Kim Powell6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesNicole Waldron / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Dylan Reetz / Maria LeStage6-0, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Waldron / Zachary Wright vs Robert Majewski / Sarah Etre2-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Joseph Bucchanio vs Patricia Cerro / Michael Majewski6-3, 6-2
2024-04-28vs MCAC:BraudeP:BraudeP/TravisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Waldron / Joseph Bucchanio vs Pavel Braude / Tatiana Malone3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Freeman / Todd Lasky vs Elisa Zawadzkas / JC Bouvier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Waldron / Zachary Wright vs Kyra Travis / Timothy Clark2-6, 4-6
2024-04-28vs MCAC:BraudeP:BraudeP/TravisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJon Stetkis Sperco / Nicole Waldron vs Gregory Cole / Tatiana Malone6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKevin Kelly / Alison Harbilas vs Jimmy Kelsey / Lauriene Morin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichelle Waldron / John Wright vs Kyra Travis / Edward Mckenna6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNicole Waldron / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Jennifer Majewski / Samuel Majewski7-5, 4-3
W#2 DoublesChealsey Giatrelis / Zachary Wright vs Merry Abbott / Dave Murray6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Wright / John Wright vs Michael Majewski / Kim Powell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-07vs MCAC:BraudeP:BraudeP/TravisLost 12
L#1 DoublesChealsey Giatrelis / Zachary Wright vs Elisa Zawadzkas / JC Bouvier4-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesJoseph Bucchanio / Michelle Waldron vs Soraya Stevens / Pavel Braude5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGerard Melillo / Kathryn Freeman vs Lauriene Morin / Jimmy Kelsey6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNicole Waldron / Jon Stetkis Sperco vs Jennifer Majewski / Samuel Majewski6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDenise Wright / John Wright vs Anna Godshalk / Dave Murray5-7, 2-3
W#3 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Kevin Kelly vs Robert Majewski / Carolyn McGarr-Lee7-6, 4-3
2024-03-03vs MCAC:BraudeP:BraudeP/TravisLost 12
W#1 DoublesChealsey Giatrelis / Gerard Melillo vs Pavel Braude / Kimberly Gazal Santos6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJames Veninger / Michelle Waldron vs Devon Puglia / Kyra Travis5-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Lasky / Nicole Waldron vs Brian Bates / Tia Lilly2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed FLT 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:WaldronM:WaldronM/WrightD44131126220
2MCAC:MajewskiJ:MajewskiJ/MajewskiS2681636244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
James Veninger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Michelle Waldron
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Nicole Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.76
Kathryn Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Chealsey Giatrelis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Denise Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Gerard Melillo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.58
Alison Harbilas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jon Stetkis Sperco
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Joseph Bucchanio
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Todd Lasky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Waldron + Jon Stetkis Sperco5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Veninger
141W–36L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
Michelle Waldron
41W–34L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
Nicole Waldron
38W–21L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
Kathryn Freeman
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chealsey Giatrelis
14W–10L career · type M · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Denise Wright
30W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Gerard Melillo
21W–18L career · type M · 9 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Alison Harbilas
59W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jon Stetkis Sperco
60W–36L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Bucchanio
54W–56L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Lasky
17W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.