Teams

Wisehaven - Myers

2023 USTA 18 & Over League · 5.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-08vs RCW - WolfemanLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Matthew Taylor vs Dave Wolfe / Dave Musser7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVince Ha / Peter Landis vs Jared D Howat / Dylan Tull4-6, 5-7
2023-06-28vs RCW - WolfemanLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Landis / Jonathan Arbittier vs Dave Wolfe / Jared D Howat3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Lawton / Lee Kennedy vs Choopat Suvimolstean / Dylan Tull4-6, 4-6
2023-06-24vs RCW - WolfemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Lee Kennedy vs Dave Wolfe / Ryan Mellinger6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-14vs RCW - WolfemanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Matthew Taylor vs Dave Wolfe / Lamar Jackson6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJonathan Arbittier vs Dylan Tull0-6, 1-6
2023-06-10vs RCW - WolfemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Lawton / Lee Kennedy vs Jared D Howat / Lamar Jackson6-4, 6-4
2023-05-31vs RCW - WolfemanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Taylor / Peter Landis vs Jared D Howat / Dave Wolfe6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPhilip Myers vs Lamar Jackson4-6, 4-6
2023-05-24vs RCW - WolfemanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Matthew Taylor vs Jared D Howat / Dave Musser6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesVince Ha vs Lamar Jackson2-6, 1-6
2023-05-20vs RCW - WolfemanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Matthew Taylor vs Ryan Mellinger / Dylan Tull6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAdam Lawton vs Choopat Suvimolstean4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Lawton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Jonathan Arbittier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lee Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matthew Taylor
published
Peter Landis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Philip Myers
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Vince Ha
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Kennedy + Philip Myers4153% games−8.3% vs expected
Lee Kennedy + Adam Lawton123 matchesnot enough data
Philip Myers + Matthew Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adam Lawton
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Arbittier
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lee Kennedy
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Taylor
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Landis
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Philip Myers
45W–17L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vince Ha
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.