Teams

LBible-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-21vs KGreen-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Molly Andrews1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLora Alkhawam / Judy Faubert vs Keshia Green / Alison Sinclair3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Haslett / Kathleen Young vs Lauren Redmond / Jui-Hua Hsieh6-3, 7-6
2025-04-19vs KMasood-ENOLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Julia Haslett vs Mackenzie Warner / Katherine Beall6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Courtney Rivard1-6, 3-6
2025-04-14vs CAvery-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie Jackson / Julia Haslett vs Heather Herndon / Beth Spinarski1-6, 4-6
2025-03-24vs LCaldwell-SVCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Faubert / Rhiannon Ludington vs Charmayne Rozenek / Kristine Potter6-2, 6-3
2025-03-17vs KLaan-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Elizabeth Chan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Haslett / Jessica Nagy vs Wendy Lindberg / Christine Gladman1-6, 2-6
2025-02-24vs BAnderson-ENOWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulia Haslett / Ragini Singh vs Jeanne Murray / Meta Kuehn6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudy Faubert / Lora Alkhawam vs Beth Anderson / Suzanne Hallquist6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Ekaterina Seregina
published
3.68
Kristin Cooley
published
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.48
Lora Alkhawam
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Ragini Singh
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.31
Judy Faubert
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.23
Sara Loeblein
published
3.14
Rhiannon Ludington
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Wilton Burns
published
2.94
Susan Graff
published
2.91
Kathleen Young
published
2.89
Julia Haslett
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Jessica Nagy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralie Bible + Judy Faubert8072% games+9.4% vs expected
Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible12261% games+5.3% vs expected
Loralie Bible + Jessica Nagy404 matchesnot enough data
Lora Alkhawam + Judy Faubert314 matchesnot enough data
Rhiannon Ludington + Judy Faubert303 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Cooley + Judy Faubert303 matchesnot enough data
Ragini Singh + Julia Haslett213 matchesnot enough data
Judy Faubert + Julia Haslett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ekaterina Seregina
23W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Kristin Cooley
34W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Lora Alkhawam
88W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ragini Singh
94W–47L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3
Judy Faubert
86W–23L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Sara Loeblein
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Rhiannon Ludington
93W–83L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Wilton Burns
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Susan Graff
27W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kathleen Young
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Julia Haslett
47W–55L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Jessica Nagy
25W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.