Teams

GTC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-14vs GTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSue Hickey / Tamara Bianchi vs Claudia Pillow / Erika Vincent6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Allen / Sanda McMillan vs Deborah Clark / Deidre Shanley7-6, 6-4
2023-06-07vs DTC YELLOWWon 20
W#2 DoublesSue Hickey / Sanda McMillan vs Deborah Yoder / Julie Underdahl6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Thurman / Katai Itta vs Kathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman7-6, 6-3
2023-05-31vs CACM REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesTamara Bianchi / Sue Hickey vs Jodi Brown / Melanie Darden6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatai Itta / Linda Thurman vs Karla Simons / Barbara Hall6-3, 6-3
2023-05-24vs LTC-D REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSue Hickey / Tamara Bianchi vs April Kobayashi / Nancy Driver6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Thurman / Katai Itta vs Vera Aaron / Martha McNamara2-6, 4-6
2023-05-10vs CACM GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesKimberly Allen / Sanda McMillan vs Lise Uhrich / Mary Mathis6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatai Itta / Tamara Bianchi vs Becky Reimers / Jimmie Whorton6-2, 6-1
2023-05-03vs MC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesSue Hickey / Tamara Bianchi vs Michelle Workman / Patricia Shaw6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSanda McMillan / Kimberly Allen vs Ana Bland / Mai Lee6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBelinda Nelson / Lena Ursten Hobbs vs Teri Harrington / Marie Louise Barrett5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Sue Hickey
published
3.52
Belinda Nelson
published 3.5
3.50
Sanda McMillan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Suzette Emerson
published 3.5
3.35
Linda Thurman
published
3.18
Tamara Bianchi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Lena Ursten Hobbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Katai Itta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Hickey + Sanda McMillan6260% games+5.2% vs expected
Lena Ursten Hobbs + Katai Itta134 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Nelson + Sue Hickey213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Thurman + Tamara Bianchi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Hickey
26W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Belinda Nelson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Sanda McMillan
93W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Suzette Emerson
105W–67L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Linda Thurman
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Tamara Bianchi
93W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lena Ursten Hobbs
179W–121L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Katai Itta
59W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.