Teams

LA - Strungover

2025 SoCal Doubles WEEKDAY - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-12-04vs LA - The Dream TeamLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Licht / Stephanie Meyer vs Lisa Klingenberg / Danelle Geller3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Shoop / Kelly Moss vs Wendy Marcus / Julie Woolenberg7-6, 5-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Werner / Kara Salmonson vs Krisha Garvey / Amy Hoffman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.85
Brittany Blackie
published 4
3.76
Lisa Partain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Satsuki Yamashita
published
3.74
Susie Shoop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Kelly Moss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Carrel Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Gloria Ziperovich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Licht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Helena Schwartz
published 4
3.51
Jessica Hoffman
published
3.49
Rachel Werner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Kara Salmonson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Lauren Giordano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrel Hoffman + Jessica Hoffman3644% games−0.4% vs expected
Kelly Moss + Lisa Partain3256% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Moss + Satsuki Yamashita224 matchesnot enough data
Carrel Hoffman + Gloria Ziperovich033 matchesnot enough data
Helena Schwartz + Lisa Partain123 matchesnot enough data
Susie Shoop + Lisa Partain213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Brittany Blackie
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Lisa Partain
57W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Satsuki Yamashita
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Susie Shoop
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Kelly Moss
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carrel Hoffman
92W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Gloria Ziperovich
81W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Lisa Licht
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Helena Schwartz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jessica Hoffman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
Rachel Werner
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kara Salmonson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lauren Giordano
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.