Teams

DTC PURPLE

2024 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 9.5 - ITA

14 players · average NTRP 4.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-25vs CP NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Linton / Margaret Harwood vs SAMUEL TORREZ / Madison Hoffman6-3, 6-3
2024-08-18vs BP GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Harwood / Aaron Kirkpatrick vs Kelly Buckley / Alex Pedersen2-6, 6-7
2024-08-04vs LTC-M REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Allen / John Haywood vs Logan Shapiro / Brian Nelson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-21vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargaret Harwood / Weston Blakeslee vs Suzanne Hale / Vinh-Hung Le6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
John Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.67
John Linton
published
4.64
Anish Parikh
published 5
4.57
Kenny Leavitt
published
4.45
Weston Blakeslee
published
4.43
Kara Gerczynski
published
4.34
Margaret Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Kimberly Allen
published
4.31
Juliana Okulski
published
Ashley Parsons
published 4.5
4.18
Devin Bostick
published 4.5
3.29
Lindsay Morgan
published
Sarah Marks
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Aaron Kirkpatrick
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
John Haywood
77W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.75
John Linton
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Anish Parikh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.64
Kenny Leavitt
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.57
Weston Blakeslee
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.45
Kara Gerczynski
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Margaret Harwood
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
4.34
Kimberly Allen
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
Juliana Okulski
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Ashley Parsons
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Devin Bostick
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Lindsay Morgan
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
3.29
Sarah Marks
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.