Teams

LI Health & Racquet, Kaye/Connolly

2022 18&Over Women Night · 2.5 Night

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-26vs Bethpage, MorinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarianne Krapf / Ditas Campo vs Flavia Chillemi / Michelle Endelson6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesPatricia Cain vs Sabrina Barbieri0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMary Locascio / SUYING WU vs Vicky Shaw / Laura Sabnani6-1, 6-1
2022-07-19vs LI - Lynbrook, NorrisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Locascio / Marianne Krapf vs Ellen Fogel / Dunja Froman6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDitas Campo vs Lauren Norris6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-07-12vs LI Health & Racquet, FreemanWon 21
L#1 DoublesDoreen Tufano / Marianne Krapf vs Marcia Montoya / Randee Silberfeld1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSandra Picerno vs Amy Raupp6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatricia Cain / Karen Kaye vs Gina Malone / Sumalee Siegmund6-4, 6-3
2022-06-28vs Bethpage, MorinWon 30
W#1 DoublesDitas Campo / Patricia Cain vs Cristina Kossegi / Suzanne Leisen6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSandra Picerno vs Sadatu Salami6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Kaye / Mary Locascio vs Vicky Shaw / Michelle Endelson7-6, 6-3
2022-06-20vs LI - Lynbrook, NorrisLost 03
L#1 DoublesDitas Campo / Marianne Krapf vs Melanie Graham / Ellen Fogel2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSandra Picerno vs Lauren Norris5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Cain / Karen Kaye vs Dunja Froman / Michelle Lankri6-7, 2-6
2022-06-14vs LI Health & Racquet, FreemanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarianne Krapf / Doreen Tufano vs Randee Silberfeld / Marcia Montoya6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSandra Picerno vs Mary Ann Camarda6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Kaye / Patricia Cain vs Linda Hyman / Gina Malone6-3, 6-3
2022-06-10vs Bethpage, MorinLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoreen Tufano / Aly Ahn vs Aki Bowman / Kathy Rzonca2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSUYING WU vs Sabrina Barbieri2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Locascio / Ditas Campo vs Laura Sabnani / Michelle Endelson6-0, 6-1
2022-05-24vs LI - Lynbrook, NorrisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarianne Krapf / Ditas Campo vs Ellen Fogel / Patricia Hoeffner6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSandra Picerno vs Lauren Norris6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Kaye / Patricia Cain vs Melanie Graham / Michelle Lankri6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-17vs LI Health & Racquet, FreemanLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarianne Krapf / Doreen Tufano vs Marcia Montoya / Sumalee Siegmund6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAly Ahn vs Amy Raupp4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Kaye / Mary Locascio vs MAUREEN FREEMAN / Maureen Desmond5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LI - Lynbrook, Norris09151021241
2LI Health & Racquet, Kaye/Connolly09161125226
3LI Health & Racquet, Freeman09121432260
4Bethpage, Morin0991735260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Sandra Picerno
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Maura Connolly
published
2.72
Ditas Campo
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.66
Aly Ahn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Doreen Tufano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Patricia Cain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Karen Kaye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne Krapf
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Mary Locascio
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
SUYING WU
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Cain + Karen Kaye5552% games+2.1% vs expected
Doreen Tufano + Marianne Krapf224 matchesnot enough data
Maura Connolly + Ditas Campo303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Kaye + Marianne Krapf123 matchesnot enough data
Marianne Krapf + Ditas Campo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandra Picerno
77W–64L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
Maura Connolly
49W–51L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ditas Campo
29W–34L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Aly Ahn
12W–23L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Doreen Tufano
28W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.48
Patricia Cain
18W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Karen Kaye
14W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marianne Krapf
13W–20L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Locascio
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
SUYING WU
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.