Teams

Knight 40s 6.5 Combo M Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men 40 Tues

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-07vs Jackson 40s 6.5 Combo M Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDon Knight / Tom Lipscomb vs Garland Hilliard / Kevin Herndon2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShiladitya Paul / Rod Mendoza vs Anthony Jackson / Chip Perrin1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Reece / David Apple vs Alex Partagas / Scott Laughlin1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesDavid Apple / Nathan Smith vs Glenn Gorman / Devin White6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShiladitya Paul / Rod Mendoza vs MIKE ROBINSON / Roy Malac6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Reece / Donald O'Brien vs Rick Fowler / Rick Williamson6-0, 6-2
2025-08-05vs Kreager 40s 6.5 Combo M Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesNathan Smith / David Apple vs Kevin VanVooren / Robert Davis0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDon Knight / Donald O'Brien vs Kenton Kreager / Pat Hogan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShiladitya Paul / Rod Mendoza vs Craig Wasserman / Anthony Scott Crawford7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men 40 Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tim Mounce
published
3.14
Shiladitya Paul
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Don Knight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Douglas Reece
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Rod Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
David Apple
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Tom Lipscomb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shiladitya Paul + Rod Mendoza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Mounce
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Shiladitya Paul
19W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Don Knight
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Douglas Reece
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Rod Mendoza
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
David Apple
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Lipscomb
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.